| Baroness Young of Old
Scone: I think Dr King has already spoken
about the fact we have got a number of sites
where a risk based approach will be
appropriate and we have got others where,
quite frankly, we already have a very cost
effective way of taking the data.
Q37 Mr Khan:
Reducing regional variations
in hourly charges?
Baroness Young of Old
Scone: We have looked at those regional
variations and, alas, the idea that somehow
the lowest charge if applied across the
board would produce savings, does not hold
water, because in correcting the methodology
and making it more standard between our
regions we have in fact come to the point
where the charges vary remarkably little
between regions and are above the £20-24 per
hour rather than the £13 per hour, which is
the minimum level looked at by the NAO. So
we have made more standard the costing
methodology and the result is there is very
little variation between the regions.
Q38 Mr Khan:
More consistent cost
allocations?
Baroness Young of Old
Scone: We are clear that more consistent
cost allocations are important, and we have
commented on how we will therefore take
money away from water management costs and
put it into flood risk management costs, but
in overall terms to the Agency it does not
save money, it simply reallocates it to a
different head.
Q39 Mr Khan:
For those potential cost
savings you have agreed with the NAO, what
is your timetable for achieving them?
Baroness Young of Old
Scone: In two of the examples where the NAO
gave us targets, in fact they were
illustrative recommendations. They said, "If
you were able to ...", for example, "...
reduce the cost of asset management by 5%,
it would save X amount of money." Similarly,
"If you adopted a risk based approach to
site visits which reduced site visits by 5%,
it would save 5% of the cost". These were
merely illustrative figures. In fact the
work which has gone on to look at the scope
for, for example, risk based visits has
shown where we can and cannot take a risk
based approach, and of course because the
visits are very different at different sorts
of sites, a straight read-across from a 5%
reduction in visits to a 5% saving does not
necessarily follow. What we are involved in
now is looking at the capacity for making
savings in the areas where genuine savings
are possible and have either got savings
underway that used the NAO methodology or
else are looking at what the potential is.
Q40 Mr Khan:
Forgive me if this sounds
rude, but if you want to give us further
evidence, please send a memo; for the
purpose of the oral evidence it is really
important you be concise because we have
lots of questions. Of the estimated savings
identified by the NAO, between £1.4 and £2.5
million, you have explained you do not
necessarily agree with the top level of that
bracket, how much of that do you think you
can achieve according to your own assessment
of NAO targets versus savings?
Baroness Young of Old
Scone: We believe we can save somewhere
between £4.5 million and £4.1 million, but
that would not be simply on the NAO
recommendations. That is on the programme of
efficiencies we already had in place in
water management.
Q41 Mr Khan:
Over what period of time?
Baroness Young of Old
Scone: Over the next four years - three
years in total, 31/2 years bearing in mind
we are half way through the financial year.
Q42 Mr Khan:
Do you think one of the
reasons why there may have been a delay in
making the savings is because the cost of
the water resource management is met
completely by the charges on holders of the
abstraction licences? Would that be a
de-motivating factor to you in making
savings?
Baroness Young of Old
Scone: I am sorry, I did not catch that.
Q43 Mr Khan:
The cost of the water
resource management, as I understand it, is
met completely by the licences. Is that
correct?
Baroness Young of Old
Scone: The aim should be that the cost of
water resource management should be met by
licence charges, yes.
Q44 Mr Khan:
That has no bearing on
the apparent delay in making the savings
identified in the Report?
Baroness Young of Old
Scone: Clearly where there is cost recovery,
one of the important things for the Agency
is to make sure it is able to demonstrate to
chargepayers it is efficient, and every year
we have been able to show our charges have
gone up at a rate less than inflation as a
result of our efficiency programmes. |